Schuylkill notes are small pieces of paper with symbolism-oriented conspiracy theories printed on them which have appeared in many locations in the United States in different forms. Authorship of the notes is unknown, with them often being found inside food packaging, hanging from trees along hiking trails and in state parks. They have been discovered primarily in northeastern and central Pennsylvania. The earliest social media report of a found note was in 2019, though some reports indicate that similar notes appeared as early as 2015 and just weren't reported. In 2020, the majority of the notes were reportedly discovered within the packaging of food products purchased from grocery stores in Schuylkill County, which is why they were dubbed “Schuylkill Notes.” After a local news station reported the story in 2023, the FDA conducted an investigation due to food tampering being a federal crime. No conclusions were ever reached. The notes have also been reported as being found in New Jersey, New York, and Maryland, but the vast majority of the notes have been discovered in Pennsylvania. They usually contain 19 lines of text seeming to combine multiple conspiracy theories. The products containing the notes were purchased in multiple grocery stores such as Walmart, Target, Giant, Weis Markets, Wegmans, Trader Joe's, Dollar General, CVS, Kohl's, Goodwill, Lowe's, Cabela's and Aldi. Though there have been groups online that have investigated the notes, no one has ever been able to trace them back to the perpetrator. Until further information is discovered, the Schuylkill Notes will remain one of Pennsylvania’s more intriguing mysteries.
A Pennsylvania Mystery That Lingers
Schuylkill notes are small pieces of paper with symbolism-oriented conspiracy theories printed on them which have appeared in many locations in the United States in different forms. Authorship of the notes is unknown, with them often being found inside food packaging, hanging from trees along hiking trails and in state parks. They have been discovered primarily in northeastern and central Pennsylvania. The earliest social media report of a found note was in 2019, though some reports indicate that similar notes appeared as early as 2015 and just weren't reported. In 2020, the majority of the notes were reportedly discovered within the packaging of food products purchased from grocery stores in Schuylkill County, which is why they were dubbed “Schuylkill Notes.” After a local news station reported the story in 2023, the FDA conducted an investigation due to food tampering being a federal crime. No conclusions were ever reached. The notes have also been reported as being found in New Jersey, New York, and Maryland, but the vast majority of the notes have been discovered in Pennsylvania. They usually contain 19 lines of text seeming to combine multiple conspiracy theories. The products containing the notes were purchased in multiple grocery stores such as Walmart, Target, Giant, Weis Markets, Wegmans, Trader Joe's, Dollar General, CVS, Kohl's, Goodwill, Lowe's, Cabela's and Aldi. Though there have been groups online that have investigated the notes, no one has ever been able to trace them back to the perpetrator. Until further information is discovered, the Schuylkill Notes will remain one of Pennsylvania’s more intriguing mysteries.
When Reese Witherspoon Was Mistaken For a Real Lawyer
Academy Award-winning actress Reese Witherspoon was once called to jury duty in Beverly Hills. She assumed she would be dismissed, but instead was selected to serve on a lengthy civil trial that lasted about two weeks. The case involved a dispute between a woman and a dog owner after the woman was injured while putting her hand into a fight between the dogs. The strangest moment came during the jury’s deliberations, when the group needed to choose a foreperson. According to Witherspoon, the other jurors quickly decided that she should take the role. The actress found it odd that her fellow jurors would choose her. When she asked why they had singled her out, their explanation left her stunned: they believed she had been to law school. Realizing that her fictional academic credentials as Elle Woods in the 2001 film Legally Blonde had apparently blurred with reality, Witherspoon said she immediately corrected the misconception. She explained to her fellow jurors that not only did she not go to law school, she didn’t even finish college. Witherspoon said the experience gave her an unsettling insight into how some people approach jury deliberations. She recalled hearing fellow jurors make judgments based on personal impressions rather than the evidence presented during the trial. The experience prompted her to reflect on the importance of understanding the law and taking jury service seriously. Despite her initial disbelief at being selected as foreperson, Witherspoon said she took the responsibility seriously and helped guide the jury through its deliberations. In a fitting twist, Elle Woods may have been fictional, but her influence on Witherspoon's real-life jury duty was anything but.
Be Careful if You Use a “Smart Cart" at the Supermarket
One of the many promises of artificial intelligence is that it will help us do everything better — work faster, research more seamlessly, and perhaps be more financially prudent. Well, not exactly. Research suggests that AI-assisted shopping may end up making you spend a lot more. AI shopping assistants can now suggest recipes, recommend products and even build an entire grocery cart from a simple request. Walmart’s Sparky, for example, can turn a “What’s for dinner?” prompt into meal ideas and add the ingredients to a shopper’s order. There's just one catch for those trying to save money: People using these AI tools appear to be buying more. Albertsons, Walmart and Instacart have all reported larger baskets or higher sales among shoppers using their AI-powered shopping assistants. This is supported by a new study from the University of London, which discovered that shoppers who used AI-powered shopping carts spent a whopping 32% more at the supermarket than those who stuck with an ordinary shopping cart. That increase in spending can't simply be attributed to men actually remembering to buy everything on the shopping list. The study resulted in people buying more items and lingering longer in the aisles — good for the stores, not so much for the shoppers.
Taco Bell’s New Ice Cream Taco Gives a Classic Treat a Churro Twist
Taco Bell has teamed up with Salt & Straw again for a new take on the classic ice cream taco. The Salt & Straw Churro Ice Cream Taco launched nationwide on September 1 and is available at participating locations for a limited time while supplies last. At $3.99, it starts with a crispy waffle cone shell filled with a new churro ice cream, then adds puffed rice and a dark chocolate-flavored coating. This combination makes it creamy, crispy and crunchy all at once. There's also a drink inspired by the dessert. The Salt & Straw Choco-Waffle Chiller starts at $4.69 and features vanilla ice cream blended with churro crumbles and waffle cone pieces. It's topped with whipped cream, additional waffle cone pieces, and a crackable chocolatey shell. Both products are now available at participating Taco Bell locations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





